Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On Dec 29, 2008, at 12:45 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Robert Kern >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> You might want to follow numpy's lead and define complex64 (float >>> complex), >>> complex128 (double complex), etc. >>> >> I really like your idea... Let's see what other people think about >> this... > > Yes. Note that "double complex" typically means a complex with double- > prec real and imaginary parts, not 128 bits.
Right. numpy goes with the convention that the bit-width suffix is the width of the entire item, not the component real and imaginary parts for the complex type. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
