On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:47 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > Please also note that the code below also fails to cythonize. I bet > this gotcha is not related to my latest patches for 'size_t' > > > cdef class A: > cdef readonly Py_ssize_t n
Well, yes and no. People used to be able to write "ctypedef unsigned long size_t" and have it work. I pushed a fix and some tests. The public attribute stuff is slightly hacky, but I'm going to be revising that to handle complex types anyways. BTW, I didn't see ulong <= size_t <= ulonglong ordering in PyrexTypes yet, did we get consensus on this? - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
