Mark Lodato wrote:
> Another way around the overhead
> would be to build the ufunc wrapping into Cython, perhaps as a
> decorator or something.

I've never looked at the implementation of ufuncs, so this may
be completely nonsensical, but would it be possible to pass
shape/strides info into the function, so that it could do its
own looping over the data?

-- 
Greg

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to