Carl Witty wrote:
> Since
> __pyx_base has no components of type (void(*)(void)), an assignment to
> a storage location with that type "can't possibly" interfere with an
> assignment to __pyx_base (according to the ANSI C aliasing rules), and
> gcc is perfectly within its rights to reorder the two.

Blarg.

<rant>
I'm getting really annoyed by the way the C standards are
going. All these tricky rules concerning casting and aliasing
are making it very awkward to use the language as a high-level
assembler with any confidence that it will do what you ?&^%$
well *tell* it!
</rant>

-- 
Greg
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to