Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > Of course, I could live if Cython does this: > > - Python semantics for '%' > - C semantics for an all-new operator '%%'. Just thinking on what > Python has done with '//' > BTW I'm +0 on a new %%. As long as there is also a function in the cython module to do the same while having Python-compatible syntax.
And I'm definitely +1 on having "<unsigned>a % <unsigned>b" mean "a %% b". Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
