Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > However, myself I consider for-from present mostly for backwards > compatability anyway,
Efficiency wasn't the only reason I added the for-from loop to Pyrex. Equally important, perhaps more so, is that it provides a concise and readable way of specifying inclusion or exclusion of each endpoint. As for the value of the loop variable after the loop, I'd be willing to consider it undefined, so that whatever behaviour is most efficiently implementable can be used. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
