On Mar 8, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Robert Bradshaw > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Feb 26, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: >>> >>> [2] seems fine, but what about [3] ?? Should we specialize the >>> method >>> and make it return 'int' ?? >> >> Yes. Actually, isn't "sign_and_name" supposed to return the actual >> name of the enum? >> > > But an anon enum has no name!
Oh, now I see what you're asking about. Yes, let's just return "int" in this special case. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
