Hi,

Kurt Smith wrote:
> Would it be worthwhile to pursue a fix for #135 by modifying code in
> the PostParse phase as Dag mentions here, or is the fix going to be
> subsumed by 'fixing' ticket #144?

Sorry, I totally misread "return_type" as "result_value" (head too deep in
ticket 144, I guess). So this won't be fixed by #144 and setting
"return_type" to None where you did is actually a viable solution.

Using PostParse sounds like a better approach, though.

Stefan

_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to