Stefan Behnel wrote: > Robin Becker wrote: >> Greg Ewing wrote: >>> FWIW, the current version of Pyrex handles inheriting >>> from the builtin list type okay, without the need for >>> any declarations. >>> >> yes this code is a bit out of date. >
> Not out of date (in the sense that it hasn't been worked on), but lacking > a port. This Pyrex feature dates back to March 2008 (Pyrex 0.9.7, hg rev. > 26-37). It won't be trivial to port, and from a quick glance, it looks a > bit like a clever hack. It will likely interfere with Cython's builtin > caching feature, although that might become redundant in many cases. > True/False handling is another thing that works different in Cython now, > so that must be left out. > you mistake me :) I was referring to my old pyrex compatible code; I wrote it about two years ago and pyrex has advanced since then so apparently I don't need the declarations with modern pyrex. So far as I'm aware cython is advancing wave upon wave and will eventually win great victories. ......... -- Robin Becker _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
