On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote: > BTW, my impression is that this isn't ready for cython-devel yet, > given the > amount of open questions and design choices.
I think there's a lot one could do here (e.g. automatically finding/ including dependancies, etc.) but that something really simple (you can make a .c file into an executable, why not a .pyx file) is valuable too. In terms of -devel vs. -unstable, I see -unstable as a place to put things that may break Cython (e.g. internal reorganizations, messing with the type system, or other deeper stuff). My view is that all (non-bug) tests should always pass in the tip of -devel, and of course not break things we don't have tests for yet. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
