Robert Bradshaw wrote: > On May 7, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote: > >>>> b) it is a way to solve the construction/destruction problem with C+ >>>> + classes >>> I'm not sure it does. >> I am referring to having to do it[0][0], which is needed because one >> cannot do >> >> cdef vector[int].iterator it >> >> currently. >> >> With my proposal you can do >> >> cdef vector[int].iterator it >> print it is None # True >> it = vec.begin() >> while it != vec.end(): # != would go through to wrapped objects >> print deref(it) # it.get() with my operator proposal >> inc(it) # it.next() with my operator proposal > > To clarify, your operator proposal is the inline C++ code chunk strings?
Yes. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
