Roland Schulz wrote: > I think it is important to see which features of this proposals are possible > but will only be included in the unforeseeable (=may be never) future and > what could/will be done soon. > Of course this depends on how much time there is so it is difficult to say. > > By point is, if collapsing d=a*b*c*d into one loop is possible, but is not > clear when it will be added, this proposal won't speed up calculations over > vectorized numpy for the foreseeable furture. > [...] > Why does it bog down Cython delvelopment if it is a library with ships with > cython? Also you can always require certain version of the external > components (and make it optional for complication for people not interested > in numerics).
I think the main question then is: what would be the minimum required change to the compiler that would enable providing these things as external modules? Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list Cython-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
