Danilo Freitas wrote: >> Well, what is the syntax going to be for other operators? I.e. I would >> think you could have either > > For now, we still didn't think on it. It may be another question for > vote. We could expand this thread for voting also on the syntax for > the other operators (like the constructor, the work should be the > same).
It's a good idea to treat issues seperately. Unfortunately I'm uncertain about whether it is possible in this case -- in seems to be too strongly connected with operators in my opinion though. OTOH, if operators are treated first, the conclusion for constructors will come automatically IMO. -- Dag Sverre _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
