On Jul 8, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Dag Sverre > Seljebotn<[email protected]> wrote: >> I think you mistunderstood me... I meant (1) and (2) in combination. > > Indeed... My fault this time... > >> Trying again: >> >> 1) We introduce "?" >> 2) If you do not know the exact type, you HAVE to use ?. Not using ? >> implies you know the exact type.
I think this is a bad idea. If you have an extern typedef int, how often do you really know what it is? On all platforms? With all c configuration options and into the future? Nearly every typedef int would have to be unranked, which would be a pain to code with. I'm not against the unranked/partially ordered types--it's a good one, but think it will be burdensome (as well as hugely backwards incompatible) to make it the default. (We should document the issues that may arise in the users manual though.) - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
