On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:21 PM, Robert Bradshaw<[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Kurt Smith wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Robert >> Bradshaw<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 25, 2009, at 6:37 PM, Kurt Smith wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 6:31 PM, William Stein<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Kurt Smith<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I think its best that fwrap be its own package, distributed >>>>>> separately >>>>>> from Cython. That was the vibe I got from those at the SciPy 2009 >>>>>> conference and from the recent thread on Fwrap's licensing. The >>>>>> added >>>>>> benefit is that fwrap won't weigh Cython down w.r.t. licensing >>>>>> issues >>>>>> or be an impediment to Cython's acceptance into the Python std. lib. >>>>>> >>>>>> Presuming that everyone here agrees with the above (or doesn't >>>>>> care), >>>>>> the remaining question is where to host it. Since fwrap is still >>>>>> closely linked to Cython, I think a natural spot for the mercurial >>>>>> repo would be on Cython's servers. No strong feelings here -- I'm >>>>>> just as happy putting it on bitbucket. Fwrap would *not* clutter up >>>>>> Cython's trac, or Cython's wiki. These would be elsewhere. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As the own of Cython's servers, I hereby certainly offer you >>>>> hosting space. >>>> >>>> Thanks! I'm evaluating bitbucket & googlecode to see what they offer >>>> -- apparently googlecode has mercurial support, so that is a big plus. >>>> I'll decide soon & let you know. >>> >>> I wouldn't consider it "clutter" to have an fwrap section of the >>> wiki, nor host another porject on the cython trac server. >> >> Well, this changes things significantly -- thanks for the offer! >> >> Since I'd rather work with you folks than some external organization, >> I'll keep fwrap on Cython's servers, wiki & trac. Thanks for the >> generosity! >> >> I'll start setting things up over the weekend. What's the next step(s)? > > If you point me to your repository, I'll put it up next to ours. I'll also > set up a trac project for you, and for the wiki I think > wiki.cython.org/fwrap should be good enough.
I've failed to successfully extract fwrap from hg.cython.org/gsoc-kurt using 'hg convert'. Do you (or anyone else) have experience extracting a directory from a hg repo into its own repo? We could always just copy the directory (gsoc-kurt/Tools/fwrap) and make a new repo with no history, I guess. Kurt _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
