On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:20 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>> On Oct 21, 2009, at 9:56 AM, Lisandro Dalcin wrote:
>>>> OK, patch uploaded:
>>>> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/attachment/ticket/417/typetest.diff
>>>>
>>>> Please review, and let me know if it is good enough for pushing...
>>>
>>> I'd either make the function inline or split it up into two functions
>>> so that the none_allowed argument (and possibly check for none) can be
>>> eliminated at compile time.
>>
>> +1 for an inline utility function, although splitting it might still be a
>> good idea.
>>
>> I'd also keep the "== Py_None" test first then, as this is something the C
>> compiler can either know or that the CPU can quickly execute, faster than
>> the following type check which requires at least an indirection, or even a
>> function call (so the C compiler can't reverse the two tests due to
>> potential side effects).
>>
>
> OK, many thanks for your input... I acknowledge the code in my patch
> is a crap, but I've just followed naming and implementation
> conventions for the argument type test code (just to not break the
> rules). BTW, I think the arg type test should also be improved, or
> perhaps even merged with this one we are talking about. I'll rework
> the patch.
>

Patch updated: 
http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/attachment/ticket/417/typetest.diff



-- 
Lisandro Dalcín
---------------
Centro Internacional de Métodos Computacionales en Ingeniería (CIMEC)
Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnológico para la Industria Química (INTEC)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET)
PTLC - Güemes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina
Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to