Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 13.04.2010 18:55: > Stefan Behnel wrote: >> Lisandro Dalcin, 13.04.2010 17:09: >> >>> I really cannot understand the opposition to the None handling being >>> determined by a user-selected compiler directive... >>> >> >> There is little use in a directive that everyone uses anyway. After finding >> out about it, that is... >> > Well, a lot of my typed arguments *are* None, and has None as a > perfectly valid value, so I wouldn't enable it.
Ah, so now we're getting to the 'why' of this discussion. lxml contains one(!) function with a typed argument that allows None, and that has a None default argument. So we see the world from completely different angles. Could you give code examples where typed None arguments make sense for you? Stefan _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
