On May 17, 2010, at 4:09 AM, Haoyu Bai wrote: > On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Robert Bradshaw > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On May 3, 2010, at 8:40 AM, Craig Citro wrote: >> >>>> Just a suggestion, take it or leave it: >>>> >>>> For my GSoC work I found google's codereview to be a very helpful >>>> tool. >>>> >>>> http://code.google.com/p/rietveld/wiki/CodeReviewHelp >>>> >>>> It allows you to submit patches that are presented in an app-engine >>>> GUI. Reviewers can make comments & suggestions that are local to >>>> each >>>> change in the patch. >>>> >>>> Perhaps it would be easier to use for interactive patch review than >>>> trac. (It works seamlessly with mercurial, too). >>>> >>> >>> +10 -- we should *totally* start using rietveld. (Plus, in a month >>> or >>> two, Robert and I will be totally in love with it.) >> >> >> I already am :). It may be good to put up a repo on hg.cython.org (so >> it's easy for people to sync up with what you have to try it out and >> play with it). Also, did you set up a blog yet? >> >> - Robert >> > > Hi, > > My blog that dedicated to the Cython GSoC work has been set up at > here: > > http://haoyugsoc.wordpress.com/ > > I'll post weekly update onto this blog.
Excellent. > It would be cool for me to have a repo on hg.cython.org, though Craig > and me were thinking that since the work involves many small patches > so it would be a lot of lightweight branches inside the repo, which > would be not easy for others to try it out. However, a repo would be > good to host and backup my work and help me sync among my computers. > So, then how to get the repo setup? Done. http://hg.cython.org/gsoc-haoyu/ You can push using the same password that was set up for trac. > Meanwhile I have play around rietveld. An issue for Cython ticket #422 > is created here: (with a revised patch) > http://codereview.appspot.com/1228043/show > > Seems there is no tight integration of trac and rietveld. For now I > will have the issue description in rietveld be a url point to Cython > trac issue. Or vice-versa would be fine as well. > I'll see if I can have some simple scripts to automate the > workflow a bit more. :) That would be good. - Robert _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
