On May 18, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Stefan Behnel wrote:

> Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 18.05.2010 16:13:
>> Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>> Lisandro Dalcin, 18.05.2010 15:38:
>>>> building any of these MPI from sources takes time, it will load the
>>>> machine paying very little to us.
>>>
>>> Hudson only has to do it once, so that the packaged binary becomes
>>> available. Artifacts created in one build job can be reused in  
>>> another, and
>>> Hudson keeps a trace back to the original build job that the  
>>> artifact
>>> originated from.
>>
>> If Sage is built in such a job (the Sage distro, not the library, but
>> the latter cannot build without the former)
>
> I didn't know that. Does this mean we have to build basically-all-of  
> Sage
> before we can build the sagelib to test Cython with it? Or can we  
> cut down
> the dependencies to something smaller and more interesting? (I guess
> 'interesting' is pretty relative here, though...)

What I propose is that we just take a build Sage library, and to test  
it we just re-install Cython and re-build the Sage library. (I've got  
a setup to do this, but can't log into Hudson to try it out).

- Robert


_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to