On 25 June 2010 02:33, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote: > Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 24.06.2010 20:29: >> pxi I think we've pretty much deprecated > > Objection to anything that deprecates .pxi. Inclusion is a very convenient > way to split a single extension module up into separate files that depend > on each other and form a common API. As long as we do not support linking > together multiple .pyx modules in a similarly simple way, I can't see it > being deprecated any time soon. >
I think Dag was talking about generation of *.pxi files with API declarations. Regarding using *.pxi for splitting a module in separate files (as I do in my projects), the pxi extension is just a convention (as Greg pointed out). We could use any extension we want, right? -- Lisandro Dalcin --------------- CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) Predio CONICET-Santa Fe Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169 _______________________________________________ Cython-dev mailing list [email protected] http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev
