mark florisson, 14.01.2011 12:08:
> On 14 January 2011 12:06, Stefan Behnel<stefan...@behnel.de>  wrote:
>
>> Robert Bradshaw, 14.01.2011 10:05:
>>> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>>>>> mark florisson, 13.01.2011 12:05:
>>>>>> In any case, there are virtually no changes when the --gdb
>>>>>> flag is inactive. These last additions would be very welcome [...]
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, here's a general statement. I personally consider the debugging
>> support
>>>>> new, experimental and not a critical feature for compiler or language.
>> You
>>>>> are the current maintainer of that part anyway, so I'm fine with
>> merging
>>>>> the changes for 0.14.1, even unseen, as long as it doesn't break
>> anything
>>>>> that's more important.
>>>>
>>>> I'm actually looking at that code right now.
>>>
>>> I've merged this.
>>
>> The build complains because it cannot find a file called
>>
>> Cython/Debugger/do_repeat.pyx
>>
>
> I don't have it, how does it complain?

https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/cython-devel-build-py2-trunk/744/console

setup.py says:

     compiled_modules = ["Cython.Plex.Scanners",
                         "Cython.Plex.Actions",
                         ...,
                         "Cython.Runtime.refnanny",
                         "Cython.Debugger.do_repeat",]

So, you're suggesting that this line can be removed?

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Cython-dev mailing list
Cython-dev@codespeak.net
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/cython-dev

Reply via email to