I think it's worth looking into, but I'm skeptical of the benefits at this point, especially compared to all the other stuff that needs doing. Specifically, I think we'll add complexity to generate more verbose and less efficient code to stick to this. I also think it might be worth keeping in mind but not yet investing a huge amount of effort into, as it may not yet have hit the sweet spot of stability vs. utility, and it may be a lot of effort to work around functions that they decide really should have been part of the core.
That being said, I would be curious how much of the non-limited API we use from Cython. If it looks to be an easy or non-invasive change, I'd love to support it. - Robert On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Lisandro Dalcin <dalc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should we try to support Py_LIMITED_API for Py>=3.2? > > -- > Lisandro Dalcin > --------------- > CIMEC (INTEC/CONICET-UNL) > Predio CONICET-Santa Fe > Colectora RN 168 Km 472, Paraje El Pozo > 3000 Santa Fe, Argentina > Tel: +54-342-4511594 (ext 1011) > Tel/Fax: +54-342-4511169 > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
