mark florisson, 28.04.2011 21:48:
I'm currently wondering about the proposed cython.typeof(). I believe it currently returns a string with the type name, and not the type itself. So I think it would be inconsistent to suddenly start allowing comparison with 'is' and 'isinstance' and such.I'm also wondering if it would be useful to allow actual type retrieval, which could be used in declarations and casts. For instance consider fusing two structs with the same attribute name but different attribute types. Perhaps in your code you want to introduce a variable compatible with such a type, e.g. consider this: ctypdef struct A: int attrib ctypedef struct B: char *attrib ctypedef cython.fused_type(A, B) struct_t cdef func(struct_t mystruct, int i): cdef cython.gettype(mystruct.attrib) var = mystruct.attrib + i
What's wrong with type() ? Stefan _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
