2011/7/30 Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>: > Hi, > > I wonder what we should do with Vitja's CyFunction branch. He mentioned > issues with it in the past (I remember that there was one specific changeset > that he considered questionable), and it seems that we found several ways to > extend the function support beyond that, which may have an impact on the > current way it's implemented. > > Is this something that makes sense to be included in 0.15, or should it wait > to get stable and further extended before being merged? > > It appears to me that there are reasons for one and the other. However, > given that we plan to drop support for (at least) Python 2.3 after this > release, I feel that we should try to get out a version that doesn't require > much fixing and maintenance. Changing the implementation of functions at > this point seems like a rather deep cut. If we agree that it's in a state > that we feel comfortable with, I wouldn't object to merging it. Otherwise, > I'd suggest to wait until after the release. > > Comments? >
That's not such a big change, CyFunction replcaces old PyCFunction_binding type and shouldn't break anything. -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
