2011/8/2 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: > 2011/8/2 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: >> 2011/7/29 Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>: >>> Vitja Makarov, 29.07.2011 10:55: >>>> >>>> 2011/7/29 Stefan Behnel<stefan...@behnel.de>: >>>>> >>>>> Vitja Makarov, 29.07.2011 10:44: >>>>>> >>>>>> 2011/7/29 Stefan Behnel: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vitja Makarov, 29.07.2011 10:08: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> this issue isn't critical and even isn't a bug at all. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Agreed. It's nothing that needs to be done for 0.15. I just thought you >>>>>>> might be interested. :D >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yeah, I tried to do this once but I've found some problems with buffer >>>>>> variables. >>>>>> >>>>>> What to do about local variables: >>>>>> >>>>>> def foo(): >>>>>> a = 1 >>>>>> >>>>>> 'a' is unused here >>>>> >>>>> That's up to the user to fix. However, there may be restrictions >>>>> regarding >>>>> the signature (inheritance etc.) that the users cannot control, so unused >>>>> *parameters* must not produce warnings. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Sure. Because of that there is separate warn.unused_args option :) >>> >>> With the caveat that gcc 4.6 produces a warning with -Wall for them, because >>> it cannot know that they originally were parameters in the Cython code. >>> >> >> >> I tried to implement this for c[p]def functions: >> >> For required args I've added CYTHON_UNUSED qualifier and removed >> unused optionals. >> > > > Stefan, do you know why skip_dispatch argument is used for > module-level cpdef function? > > There is warning about that too. >
I tried to fix the issue here: https://github.com/vitek/cython/commit/dc87be3f546ffe609fdce9514d939c147c99cf35 And here is my branch for unused_arg: https://github.com/vitek/cython/commits/_unused_args -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
