On 16 September 2011 22:20, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 September 2011 22:03, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: >> Robert Bradshaw, 15.09.2011 22:33: >>> >>> See http://wiki.cython.org/ReleaseNotes-0.15.1 This is a bugfix only >>> release, we hope to get it out shortly. >> >> I've added ticket 736 as a blocker, at least until I know what it takes to >> fix it (looking into it right now). >> >> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/736 >> >> Stefan >> _______________________________________________ >> cython-devel mailing list >> cython-devel@python.org >> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >> > > Looking at the generated code I see > > > __pyx_cur_scope->__pyx_v_a = __pyx_k_1; > __pyx_cur_scope->__pyx_v_b = __pyx_k_2; > > happening at unpacking time without a corresponding INCREF. Surely the > scope object should only ever own references and never borrow them? > The arguments from the args tuple are increffed however, just not the > default values. >
BTW, the test would be better written with a class like class UniqueObject(object): def __init__(self, value): self.value = value def __repr__(self): return repr(self.value) That makes it easier to track down refcount errors than (small) integers. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel