On 01.03.2012 17:18, Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
are saying we (somehow) stick with supporting "arr.shape[0]" in the future, and perhaps even support "print arr.shape"? (+ arr.dim, arr.strides).
What if you just deprecate ndarray support completely, and just focus on memory views?
Yes, you will break all Cython code in the world depending on ndarrays. But you will do that anyway by tempering with the interface. And as changes to the NumPy C API mandates a change to the interface, I see no reason to keep it. If you are going to break all code, then just do it completely. It is worse to stick to syntax bloat. There should not be multiple ways to do the same (like the zen of Python).
Sturla _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
