2012/5/9 Vitja Makarov <vitja.maka...@gmail.com>: > 2012/5/9 Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de>: >> Stefan Behnel, 08.05.2012 14:24: >>> Vitja has rebased the type inference on the control flow >> >> On a related note, is this fixable now? >> >> def test(): >> x = 1 # inferred as int >> del x # error: Deletion of non-Python, non-C++ object >> >> http://trac.cython.org/cython_trac/ticket/768 >> >> It might be enough to infer "object" for names that are being del-ed for >> now, and to fix "del" The Right Way when we split entries. >> > > Do you mean that `x` should be inferred as "python object" in your example? > > Yes, we may add workaround for del <unspecified_type> case. > Del is represented now by NameDeletion with the same rhs and lhs. > > We can add method infer_type() to NameAssignment and use it instead of > Node.infer_type() > >
Here I've tried to fix it, now deletion always infers as python_object https://github.com/vitek/cython/commit/225c9c60bed6406db46e87da31596e053056f8b7 That may break C++ object deletion -- vitja. _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
