Dag Sverre Seljebotn, 08.05.2012 18:52:
> Vitja Makarov wrote:
>> def partial_validity():
>> """
>> >>> partial_validity()
>> ('str object', 'double', 'str object')
>> """
>> a_1 = 1.0
>> b = a_1 + 2 # definitely double
>> a_2 = 'test'
>> c = a_2 + 'toast' # definitely str
>> return typeof(a_2), typeof(b), typeof(c)
>>
>> And this should work better because it allows to infer a_1 as a double
>> and a_2 as a string.
>
> +1 (as also Mark has hinted several times). I also happen to like that
> typeof returns str rather than object... I don't think type inferred code
> has to restrict itself to what you could dousing *only* declarations.
>
> To go out on a hyperbole: Reinventing compiler theory to make things
> fit better with our current tree and the Pyrex legacy isn't sustainable
> forever, at some point we should do things the standard way and
> refactor some code if necesarry.
That's how these things work, though. It's basically register allocation
and variable renaming mapped to a code translator (rather than a compiler
that emits assembly or byte code).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
