On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Robert Bradshaw <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Stefan Behnel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think the master branch is good enough for at least a 0.21 alpha. Are >>> there any pending changes that should go in before it can be released? Any >>> pull requests that should be considered? >> >> I started some work on support for static methods (for c++ and cdef >> classes). I'll see if I can wrap this up and create a pull request. >> >>> We should get this in, I think: >>> >>> https://github.com/cython/cython/pull/284 >>> >>> And the gdb tests are still broken. >>> >>> Robert, could you take a look through the Sage test failures? Most of them >>> might be issues in Sage rather than Cython, but it's better to make sure we >>> can either fix or safely ignore them. >> >> Yeah, I'll take a look at those. > > Not all of them look benign. I'm updating Sage to the latest release > and will see what's goin on.
The two remaining cmdline.py tests look inocuous, we should be good on that front (though I'll try to get this clean again). - Robert _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
