Hi all,
I've spent a little time working on adding support for non-type
template parameters. In doing this, it has been very easy to add
support for doing something like the following:
cdef extern from "add_const.hpp" nogil:
int myfunc1[i](int)
def test():
print myfunc1[2](a)
The downside of this is that it does not let the Cython compiler
distinguish between different kinds of template parameters.
Stricter checking could be added using a syntax like this:
cdef extern from "add_const.hpp" nogil:
int myfunc1[int i](int)
def test():
print myfunc1[2](a)
The downsides here are that the syntax doesn't really match the
existing template syntax. It will also complicate the Cython codebase
since we'll have to go to greater lengths to allow or disallow all the
different special cases for templates.
Which version would be preferable?
On a similar note, for variadic templates, would we prefer something
like
cdef extern from "my_variadic.hpp" nogil:
T myfunc2[T,...](T, ...)
or something like:
cdef extern from "my_variadic.hpp" nogil:
T myfunc2[T, Types...](T, Types... args)
Again, the latter syntax is more explicit, but it will require much more
complicated code in Cython. It also doesn't match the existing syntax
very well. The former syntax matches the existing syntax for templates
better, but will make it hard for Cython to raise errors early on in
compilation.
I'd greatly appreciate any input on the best syntax for either use-case.
Regards,
-Ian Henriksen
_______________________________________________
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
