Ah, sorry Erik, you're absolutely right. I mixed my results a bit and must
elaborate:

'setup_requires' on its own will indeed not generate the behavior I
described.

However, if you define the same dependency under 'setup_requires' AND
'install_requires', then you get the mess I mentioned. Essentially, when
you reach 'install_requires' setuptools decides that the egg it has under
.eggs suffices, and just links to it.

This isn't an issue when depending on cython because it's really just a
setup-time dependency. However, in our package we depend on numpy at both
setup- and runtime, and therefore makes sense to have it under both
'requires' flags.

This is why hooking in at the setup_requires step could be a potential
workaround, if we could get it to do a full dependency install instead of
local egg. I'm currently finishing up this approach.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Manuel Nuno Melo
> <manuel.nuno.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Erik,
> > Please post your solution; I'm curious to see it.
>
> Will do in a bit. I need to see if I can distill it somewhat from its
> original context so that it can be better understood.
>
> > Currently, we're also using setup_requires but are moving away from it
> > because of two main issues:
> >
> > 1- there's no flexibility to hook into it via setuptools.Distribution
> > subclassing (unless you rewrite the entire __init__);
>
> I don't really think that's a big issue but maybe you've encountered
> some reason that it is.
> The worse thing about it is the general chicken-egg problem that you
> need to call setup() to get your setup_requires, but you may need some
> packages pulled in from setup_requires in order to do anything useful
> with setup().
>
> d2to1 [1] solves this problem quite well, but unfortunately
> development on it is stalled for the time being.  Another alternative
> that can work quite well is some version of Daniel Holth's
> "setup-requires" hack [2].
>
> > 2- (and more serious) setuptools installs setup_requires dependencies in
> the
> > local directory, not as a system-wide install.
>
> That's a feature, not a bug.  Build requirements for a package might
> be in conflict with the versions of those same requirements you have
> already installed.  It also prevents things from being installed that
> are *not* required at runtime.  It makes it easier for projects to pin
> a little more strictly to their known-working build requirements,
> without the constraints imposed by supporting a wider range of runtime
> requirements.
>
> > Even worse, it then puts a
> > path link to the current directory under the system-wide
> easy_install.pth.
> > This means that if you install from the source directory via 'sudo
> > ./setup.py install', you get a Cython egg downloaded into that directory,
> > and its path added to sys.path (!!). Needless to say this can break in
> many
> > nasty ways...
>
> Huh??  I'm not sure we're talking about the same thing now.  The local
> .eggs cache directory created for setup_requires downloads most
> certainly does not get added to easy_install.pth.  Are you sure you're
> not thinking of `setup.py develop`?
>
> [1] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/d2to1
> [2] https://bitbucket.org/dholth/setup-requires/src
>
> > On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 1:10 PM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 14, 2016 21:07, "Manuel Nuno Melo" <manuel.nuno.m...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Our need to control cythonization comes from the fact that we
> implement
> >> > cython as a lazy and optional dependency. Lazy in the sense that we
> delay as
> >> > much as possible cythonization so that setuptools or pip have time to
> >> > install cython, if needed. Optional because we distribute both .pyx
> and
> >> > cythonized .c files, and decide on which to use based on user flags.
> >> >
> >> > We, therefore, need an Extension class that only cythonizes if we
> decide
> >> > to.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for the feedback,
> >> > Manel
> >>
> >> I have a solution for exactly this in astropy_helpers which makes it
> >> possible, for example, to pull in Cython via setup_requires, but only if
> >> it's needed.
> >>
> >> Remind me on Monday and I can point out how it works.
> >>
> >> > On Apr 14, 2016 8:17 PM, "Matthew Brett" <matthew.br...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 6:08 AM, Erik Bray <erik.m.b...@gmail.com>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:35 PM, Manuel Nuno Melo
> >> > > > <manuel.nuno.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > >> Hello devs,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> I'm developing the setup.py for a scientific package, MDAnalysis
> >> > > >> (see PR
> >> > > >> #799). We depend on distutils and setuptool. Namely, we use
> >> > > >> setuptools.extension.Extension class for our extensions.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Some older versions of setuptools (<18.0) do filename
> cythonization
> >> > > >> themselves upon initialization of the Extension object.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Because we want to control name cythonization ourselves I try to
> >> > > >> directly
> >> > > >> use distutils.extension.Extension, which has none of setuptools'
> >> > > >> cythonization. However, this doesn't work because setuptools
> >> > > >> patches
> >> > > >> distutils, so that distutils.extension.Extension effectively
> >> > > >> becomes
> >> > > >> setuptools.extension.Extension.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'm wondering what it is specifically you need to do in your
> >> > > > subclass--might it still be possible to do with a subclass of the
> >> > > > setuptools Extension?  Not saying I disagree with the overall
> idea,
> >> > > > but I also wonder if there isn't a better way.
> >> > >
> >> > > I know this is a terrible and ugly hack, but the projects I work in
> >> > > have a 'fake_pyrex' directory, that fools setuptools into thinking
> >> > > that 'pyrex' is installed, and therefore prevents it from doing the
> >> > > .pyx -> .c filename conversions in the extension:
> >> > >
> >> > > https://github.com/regreg/regreg/blob/master/setup.py#L33
> >> > >
> >> > > Cheers,
> >> > >
> >> > > Matthew
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > cython-devel mailing list
> >> > > cython-devel@python.org
> >> > > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cython-devel mailing list
> >> > cython-devel@python.org
> >> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cython-devel mailing list
> >> cython-devel@python.org
> >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cython-devel mailing list
> > cython-devel@python.org
> > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>
_______________________________________________
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Reply via email to