Robert Bradshaw schrieb am 29.07.2016 um 00:33: > Please see https://github.com/robertwb/issues-import-test/issues/ as > to what this would look like. (This is a partial import, due to github > API rate limiting issues.) Unless something looks terribly wrong, I'll > start the real migration shortly.
Nice, also the formatting and tagging. And the milestone history also seems to have passed through nicely. My comments: Tags like "C: Code Generation" look like they are referring specifically to C-Code, but I guess you meant "C-omponent". Maybe change the abbreviation to M-odule or T-opic ? Do we really need the empty "modified by" comments, e.g. here: https://github.com/robertwb/issues-import-test/issues/110 This looks a bit overly empty: https://github.com/robertwb/issues-import-test/issues/55 When I click on one of the "migrated from" links to "trac.cython.org", I get redirected back to github, but with the trac ticket number, which means I get either a 404 or a totally different ticket on github. I guess that can be fixed once we have a mapping from trac ticket numbers to github tickets. Related to that: converted ticket #73 has a reference to another trac ticket (#51) in a comment, which now links to the (wrong) github ticket #51. https://github.com/robertwb/issues-import-test/issues/73 Also, the formatting is broken in the description of that ticket (#73). Might already have been a problem in trac. And again #73: there is a link to the old hg repo in a comment. I guess we might simply not be able to recover the old hg changeset IDs to provide a mapping of those to the corresponding github changeset URLs, right? Stefan _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
