If we're going to ditch the 0.x, I'd go for 1.0 as well. I'm a huge fan of semantic versioning.
The primary reasons we kept the 0.x scheme were that * We wanted full compatibility with CPython (we're nearly there, or at least it's safe to say the differences are on par with those between different versions and implementations of Python), and * We wanted the flexibility to possibly jettison archaic features of the language or otherwise clean things up. It's worth revisiting to see if either of these are still relevant (*and* likely to be worked on in the near future). On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 10:40 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > I vote for 1.0 > > Version 29.0 sounds too much like marketing. > > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel >
_______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
