On Friday, 6 September 2013 at 10:43:38 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On 6 September 2013 10:35, eles <e...@eles.com> wrote:
But there's no equivalent to volatile statements other than
implementing your own low level thread library for use in
kernel-land
to allow synchronized to work properly.
Frankly, but each day D becomes better, it becomes worse for
systems programming. I'll have more&more difficulties to defend
it as an acceptable solution at my workplace.
I am sorry about that, but I cannot do much about it... :(
