D2RQ is typically used to *populate* an *existing* ontology with *instances* that come from a database. For this typical case, it doesn't matter whether the existing ontology is RDFS, OWL Full, OWL RL or whatever. All that matters from the point of view is that the classes and properties in the ontology have URIs.
Best, Richard On 7 Dec 2010, at 19:58, Erwachen Hz wrote: > Hello, > > I didn't try this out yet with help of D2RQ. But was wondering first > if that > for representing most semantics and stuff that a database may > contain, and > constraints ..ect > wouldn't be better to have as an output OWL Full ontology or OWL 2 > RL can be > sufficient (In case if that is possible to run out with D2RQ > mappings)? > > Thanks to make it more clear to me, > Erwachen > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another > costly > upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time > to move > off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier > to build, > use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the > Lotus > Notes Migration Kit to learn more. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d_______________________________________________ > d2rq-map-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build, use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d _______________________________________________ d2rq-map-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel
