Yes. I just observed the same problem. It seems that HAVING is ignored completely by the query translation as I always get unfiltered results.
I filed this issue: https://github.com/d2rq/d2rq/issues/212 Thanks and best regards, Peter. From: David Birtwell <augustea...@gmail.com> To: d2rq-map-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Date: 03/18/2013 07:39 PM Subject: [d2rq-dev] having sum() clause not working Hi, A colleague and I are having trouble getting HAVING clauses to work using d2rq/Jena. At present we are attempting a simple HAVING (sum(...) > x) type of clause. In the logs, we see that the "before translation" query has a > clause in it. However, the "after translation" query does not. We get no errors, just the HAVING clause does not do anything. Has anyone else experienced this issue? Thanks dlb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ d2rq-map-devel mailing list d2rq-map-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel
<<inline: graycol.gif>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book "Graph Databases" is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their applications. This 200-page book is written by three acclaimed leaders in the field. The early access version is available now. Download your free book today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/neotech_d2d_may
_______________________________________________ d2rq-map-devel mailing list d2rq-map-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/d2rq-map-devel
