Paul McNett wrote: > no PKs: no, it won't work, but don't we assume there will be PK's all > over the place already?
BTW, keying on PK was my second attempt. The first time around, I had the dicts keyed on the id() of the record object. However, I never investigated why, but the record objects were getting redefined at some point and thus getting different id()'s. I think it would be much better to avoid having to key on PK, but I decided to get the proof of concept done as fast as possible. I'll look into what is redefining the records as this is probably unnecessary and also bad for performance, at which point I can go back and key on id(rec) instead of PK. I also thought of keying on row number, but discarded that idea early on because a simple sort operation can change the row numbers. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
