Carl Karsten wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: >> On Jan 4, 2007, at 3:00 PM, Uwe Grauer wrote: >> >>> OK, revision 2590 broke it. >>> Now you can guess better why it was broken with rev 2590. >>> rev 2589 did work. >> OK, I looked up that change, and it was a pretty major one. I know >> of two outstanding issues that I should have cleaned up soon, so keep >> an eye out for updates. >> >> The problem was the introduction of the choice to keep the class >> code in the cdxml itself, or in a separate .py file. Right now the >> separate file version isn't working correctly. > > How about keeping the class code in the cdxml, which will promote the > "event's > call methods" practice: the .hit code in the cdxml will just be > something.ImHit() in some module that can be edited with my favorite editor? > > There shouldn't be lots of code in the UI anyway, right? > > Carl K >
I'm totally against code in the cdxml-file. Putting the code in a seperate xxx-code.py was working before and gave the choice to to edit it in the favorite editor. Uwe _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
