Nate Lowrie wrote: > I like this plan. I feel that the IDE is somewhat far off from it's > 1.0 release. I think that we need to integrate the various tools into > a common development environment before we can call it 1.0... After > all, it is supposed to be an Integrated Development Environment. I > think that the framework is worthy of a 1.0 status soon.
The minimum on Dabo 1.0 from my current perspective is to have unit tests covering all important functions of dBizobj and dCursorMixin, against all supported db backends. The current list of supported db's is fine for 1.0, but we need to be sure they are all working sanely. Additionally, unit tests for the UI layer would be highly desired, but I'm not as concerned about those as I am for the data layers. Beyond that, general docstring cleanup and adding docstrings to public methods and properties that don't have them yet is pretty important. Expanding them beyond the one-liner and giving calling samples and referring the reader to other complementary methods or properties. All the user hooks in dBizobj need docstrings (I don't think we should just copy/paste, but add a function like we did with makeDynamicProperty that fills in generic docstrings for each along with additional optional text). Let's push for it! -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
