Ed Leafe wrote: > On Aug 24, 2007, at 12:21 PM, Paul McNett wrote: > >> An intermediary table for getting M:M joins that doesn't have any >> other >> meaningful information other than the two foreign keys really doesn't >> require a primary key. IOW: > > The two keys together constitute a compound PK.
I know, but that isn't suitable in all situations, such as if there can be multiple entries of the same joins. -- pkm ~ http://paulmcnett.com _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
