On Saturday 01 September 2007 07:57, Paul McNett wrote: > johnf wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2007 15:43, Paul McNett wrote: > >> Agreed on it being nicer... however what kind of freaks me out is that > >> I'm not seeing a way to have a common codebase for both 3.0 and 2.x. > > > > Yea, I was wondering how supporting two pythons would work. I just see > > the 2.5 version of Dabo reaching a "stable" point and development > > stopping (maybe bug fixes). I see the new DaboIDE on the other hand > > completely in 3000. > > The only reason development of Dabo would stop would be if we abandoned it. Maybe you did not read my follow-up. I did NOT mean that development would stop. I meant that development would use python 3000. I don't see you and Ed maintaining two branchs (one for 2.5 and the other for 3000) for very long. -- John Fabiani
_______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/dabo-dev/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
