Paul McNett wrote: > Ed, > > Can you remind me of the reason why biz.delete() must happen immediately > instead of waiting for biz.save(). And why biz.cancel() couldn't cancel > the pending deletions?
So if you want to delete data, you need to save it? I think you are having flash backs to the days when deleting data didn't really delete it. > If this isn't something that we could put into Dabo, do you have > suggestions on how to implement this for my specific case? Set a flag. in your OK routine (what currently calls .save) call .delete for the flagged items. > > It still seems inconsistent that the other functions that modify the > dataset (new() and setFieldVal()) will cache the changes until save(), > while delete() must happen immediately without waiting for save(). > To me, .save and .delete operate at the same level: you can either save, or you can delete. once you have done either, you are done. so perfectly consistent. Carl K _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
