Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> 
>> I think what is happening is that I'm constructing the SQL from clause
>> as follows:
>>
>> 111     self.setFromClause("""prod_cust
>> 112  left join product_lines
>> 113    on product_lines.id = prod_cust.prod_id
>> 114  left join customers
>> 115    on customers.id = prod_cust.cust_id""")
>>
>> The new code in setChildFilter() seems to assume (by using split() 
>> [-1])
>> that the last word in the from clause is going to be the table alias,
>> but in my case the last 'word' is 'prod_cust.cust_id'.
>>
>> My code above was written prior to dabo having addJoin() and I could
>> certainly rewrite it, but I really don't want to have to if it can be
>> avoided (there are many bizobjs written this way).
> 
>       OK, there are several approaches to take. One is to forbid implicit  
> aliases, and require that from clauses be set with a specific alias  
> name. Right now I'm parsing the from clause to get the alias, and non- 
> standard from clauses like the one above will not work. The other is  
> to require that SQL Builder usage follow certain standards, which your  
> setFromClause() clearly violates.
> 
>       Can you think of any other approach? It would have to handle all of  
> the following:
> 
> self.setFromClause("prod_cust")
> self.setFromClause("prod_cust pc")
> self.setFromClause("prod_cust as pc")
> self.setFromClause("""prod_cust
>       left join product_lines
>       on product_lines.id = prod_cust.prod_id
>       left join customers
>       on customers.id = prod_cust.cust_id""")
> self.setFromClause("""prod_cust pc
>       left join product_lines
>       on product_lines.id = prod_cust.prod_id
>       left join customers
>       on customers.id = prod_cust.cust_id""")
> self.setFromClause("""prod_cust as pc
>       left join product_lines
>       on product_lines.id = prod_cust.prod_id
>       left join customers
>       on customers.id = prod_cust.cust_id""")

It would also need to handle the joins not being on separate lines like I have 
them.

Let's keep the implicitness if we can. BTW I don't consider my from clause 
non-standard, because I've always thought of JOIN as a subclause of FROM.

How about something like (untested; looking for comments on the approach only):

def getTableAlias(fromClause):
   join_strings = ["left join", "right join", "outer join", "inner join", 
"join"]
   for join_string in join_strings:
     at = fromClause.lower().find(join_string)
     if at >= 0:
       fromClause = fromClause[:at].strip()
       break
   return fromClause.strip()[-1]

Paul


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]

Reply via email to