johnf wrote: > On Wednesday 29 April 2009 10:04:58 am Paul McNett wrote: >> But you don't need that override anymore: you were only using it to see >> when it was being called > > That's why I asked if I should leave it in. I thought the response was yes.
I meant "leave the call to flushValue()" in, even though it shouldn't technically be needed. Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
