On May 19, 2009, at 5:46 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
> But Ed, what do you think of:
>
> 1) Making the child logic atts into properties, for the usual
> reasons of better
> documentation and being able to pass the prop to the constructor.
Sure, I don't see a big problem with doing that.
> 2) Ditching the dConstants thing, and just defining the possible
> values as "CASCADE",
> "IGNORE", or "RESTRICT"?
If you do that, lose the all-caps, since that was used to designate a
constant, and make any comparisons case-insensitive.
How would you handle existing code that may reference the constants?
-- Ed Leafe
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message:
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
