Użytkownik John napisał: > On Wednesday 27 January 2010 12:08:13 pm Paul McNett wrote: > >> On 1/26/10 4:55 PM, Jacek Kałucki wrote: >> >>> Użytkownik Paul McNett napisał: >>> >>>> I missed the "remote user" significance before. >>>> >>> Oh, second instance of application is enough to see problem. >>> >> I suppose I could use a second db connection in the test script. >> >> Paul >> > Ok so the remote user deletes all the children. Then won't the transaction on > the "non" remote user (local user?) fail and rollback. After the rollback > the local user can then just delete what is available - just the parent? >
Question is if there is need to fail if you want delete just deleted data? Result is the same if you really delete it yourself. From other side, there is no conflict checking in Dabo at all. What about save non new data (SQL UPDATE)? You can save any just remote deleted data without any notice, unsuccessful of course. Is such approach correct or not? -- Regards Jacek Kałucki _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
