On Wednesday 03 February 2010 03:47:33 pm Nate Lowrie wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 18:39, John <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 February 2010 03:17:23 pm Nate Lowrie wrote: > >> While we are at it, did you want to standardize on a directory > >> structure? I know it would cause us to change the structure of the > >> ide tools, but I think it would be streamline some things from a > >> pathing perspective if we required a certain directory structure that > >> was relative to HomeDirectory. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Nate > > > > I'm not sure it's a requirement. But I thought Ed has already defined > > the directory structure. I guess it is a requirement if the developer > > wants the tools to work. I would think when the IDE is complete a > > metadata table would allow the developer set their structure as they see > > fit. > > It is not a requirement. I would like us to make it requirement > though, because it cleans up much of the pathing code. While the > metadata table is an interesting idea, I am not at all thrilled with > the additional code overhead it requires in the framework. > > Regards, > > Nate
I see the metadata as almost a requirement. Most of the modern IDE's allow it. I had not considered the issue of overhead. Hmmmm. I believe Ed has always had the idea of project management being part of the IDE. But I could be speaking out of turn. Johnf _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
