Użytkownik Paul McNett napisał:
> Ok now I understand what you are saying, and you are right.
>
> Case 1:
> biz.Record.cust_name = "ABC"
> |
> cur.setFieldVal("cust_name", "ABC")
>
>
> Case 2:
> biz.setFieldVal("cust_name", "ABC")
> |
> cur.setFieldVal("cust_name", "ABC")
>
>
> I'd need to give it a little more thought, and see some opposing viewpoints,
> but
> right now it seems to me we should consider reworking it so that we have:
>
> biz.Record.cust_name = "ABC"
> |
> biz.setFieldVal("cust_name", "ABC")
> |
> cur.setFieldVal("cust_name", "ABC")
>
>
> ...especially since there's no good way to subclass dCursor.
>
>
I don't think we must do that, but Record property in business layer
should reference to that layer.
Remember you can still use bare Dabo data cursors, without business layer,
for fast data access.
Currently, accessing dBizobj.Record.field is equivalent to
dBizobj._CurrentCursor.Record.field.
There could be Record property, that refers to business layer and second,
e.g. RawRecord that refers to data layer directly.
--
Regards
Jacek Kałucki
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: [email protected]
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev
Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
