Użytkownik Paul McNett napisał: > With r6595, the time it takes to close my application goes from instantaneous > to 3-5 > seconds. There's probably unneeded scanning for changes in the > biz.cancelAll() cycle? > > I'll try to dig into this in a bit, but wanted to document the problem first.
Another missing reply? Problem is that there is no unneeded scanning. When you have wide and deep parent to grand ... grandchild biz tree, it's the only solution to make sure are changes are persisted while all nodes are buffered. I can see two solutions: 1) add option to check only current chain and add user prompt on every pointer move on modified chain (it's mean buffering only one chain - like it was previously); 2) add some kind of notification child can quick notify its parent node about changes without scanning entire tree. I'm thinking rather on second solution, but I can add first option faster if you wish. -- Regards Jacek Kałucki _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/dabo-dev Searchable Archives: http://leafe.com/archives/search/dabo-dev This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/[email protected]
